A construção do compromisso de ajustamento de conduta no Ministério Público como instrumento pacificador e de defesa de direitos humanos fundamentais

Abstract

The dissertation reviewed the commitment to conduct adjustment as a means of access to justice in the Ministry of Public. The discursive theory of Jürgen Habermas was right to the theoretical framework of the research. The method of approach was dialectical and technical documentation in the indirect mode literature. Initially, said the constitutional design Ministry of Public and their perspective of action out of court, with presentation of the model resolvent. After, dealt with the concept of access to justice in the paradigm of democratic rule of law, a vision of expansion to include other channels besides the judiciary, particularly the Ministry of Public. He acknowledged the commitment of adjustment of conduct legal business as hybrid, influenced by public law and private sectors, built by discursive reasoning, widening participation and rational understanding and accommodating. To answer the research problem was the first foray into the speech with theorizing about the judgments of justification and application of law. It was concluded that the discourse principle implies recognition of private and public autonomy, and ultimately leads to a legitimate law, because people act as co-authors and addressees of the norm. He took advantage of this theory and found its applicability in the adjustment of environmental conduct. As a legal instrument created by the dogmatic and applicator standards, with limitations, it was possible to apply the idea in the construction of discursive commitment to conduct adjustment with transformation of the Prosecutor of the Republic of Labor and the Courts of Law and Public debaters on stage, relating the fundamental human rights and ruled the planes of maximum freedom and equality. It was concluded by the legitimacy of the institute to protect fundamental human rights and to contribute to pacify conflicts metaindividuais, despite warning mechanism to be so encompassing, the court handled the application of standards, not meant to replace the jurisdiction, other mechanisms or act as peacemakers new theory of democracy.